Skip to content

Idearc’s is rolling out video around the U.S. after a limited test of sales channels and production in Seattle, San Francisco and L.A. The tests, which Kelsey’s Charles Laughlin reported on in July, involved fewer than 100 customers.

Unlike Citysearch, which offers “free” video production in exchange for long-term contracts, Superpages is going the a la carte route. Video production is priced at $990 for 30 seconds and $1,750 for 60 seconds, and is being provided by two (undisclosed) vendors. Video is already being offered by most of the other major IYPs, with varying terms.

One theoretical advantage of the Superpages approach is that advertisers have the option of buying the rights to their videos for an extra fee (the amount of which is apparently a trade secret). If advertisers pay the extra fee, they can place the videos on their own Web sites, microsites, alternative media sources, etc. On Citysearch’s model, customers don’t have the right to use their video in other places, period. Of course, they don’t have to pay for them in the first place.

On the advertising side, Superpages’ fees include a $50 monthly charge for a video icon. Advertisers can also set their own budgets for clickthroughs of the video via bid ranking and other possible forms of online marketing.

Superpages VP Robyn Rose says the company has had several takeaways from the early tests. While customers are always busy, “they care about making videos and spending time with the videographer. Indeed, the company promises that the videographer will spend up to an hour on location. Advertisers also like the onetime fee for production, as opposed to bundled fees,” she says.

Rose believes that Superpages is going to reach the “sweet spot between professional and consumer content” and compares the advertiser’s decision to opt for a third-party producer rather than making a video with a camcorder as being akin to choosing whether to build your own Web site.

To me, one of the great questions is whether advertisers really will want production fees broken out. It seems like the trend in marketing, generally, is for bundles. But we’ll see. Some vendors, of course, are avoiding video production altogether, focusing instead on helping advertisers with distribution and placement.

We’ll also see how advertisers react when they are asked to first pay for video production, and then an extra fee to also “own” the video. What I’ve observed is that the fungibility of media from one channel to the next is truly one of the great trends of 2007. Citysearch doesn’t let you do it, period. But Superpages may inadvertently discourage it by tacking on the extra fee. If advertisers have to pay a premium to put their video on Superpages, and then on their Web site and their e-mail, does it undermine the whole experience?

This Post Has One Comment

  1. The kibosh on additional distribution of this video content (beyond citysearch and superpages domains) is a vestige of the walled garden mentality that is still lingering is various online outposts. Distribution of content, as long as it is branded correctly, could serve to market these video products and drive traffic back to superpages, citysearch et al.

    Smalltown is onto on this concept

    as is Agendize

    (among many others)

Leave a Reply

Back To Top